Good grief. KBZK posted a story yesterday with the following headline:Â “Experts: childhood vaccines deemed safe.”
Was this really news on July 1, 2014? Did we not know this one, simple thing before?
Granted, there are anti-vaccination people out there who rely on junk science and exaggerated anecdotesÂ to form their opinions about the safety of vaccines. But, and this is important, they are the minority and they are — and let me be frank — fringe-case nutjobs.
By allowing the pretense that vaccinesÂ are unsafe — because otherwise why would we need a news story to say that they are safe — KBZK is pushing outÂ the worst sort of click-bait junk journalism that is aimed to appeal to the controversy and not to the facts.
What worse, when they posted the story to Facebook, the TV station prefaced it with this inane question:
I won’t go into the reasons vaccines are safe; scientists have done that or me over and over again. More evidence of their safety are the decades upon decades of vaccines being used to reduce the number of deaths from diseases. Someone I know also like to point out that if you need more evidence of the hazards of life without vaccinations, visit a cemetery and look for baby and child graves from a certain time period.Â Then remember that you can vaccinate against polio.
For some reason in this country, people nowÂ distrust scientists. I think that comes in part because the Internet makes it so easy to publish nonscientific points of view to a large audience and make them look credible. Plus, the sins of some untrustworthy scientists have given opponents of science, who usually have a financial stake in the opinion they’re supporting or a total ignorance of how the scientific process works (or both), ammunition to bluster that all scientists are corrupt, money-grubbing quacks.
On top of that, in the pursuit of “balance,” journalism often forgets that a story isn’t balanced that gives equal time to nutcases who are demonstrably, scientifically wrong. By making it seem as if the anti-vaccination stance is as valid as the real science and then prompting people to discuss whether the “risks” of vaccination are worth it, KBZK is perpetuating dangerous misinformation.